Robert Juskie and Colin Walshok recently prevailed on a motion for summary judgment in El Centro Superior Court.  Their client was sued based on the theory of respondeat superior because she was allegedly the employer of an individual involved in an automobile accident.  Plaintiff’s demanded more than $1 million to settle the case prior to the ruling on the motion for summary judgment.  The court agreed with the arguments presented by Wingert Grebing that there was no admissible evidence that the alleged employee was in the course and scope of her employment at the time of the accident, and even if she was a claim against the employer was precluded by the going and coming rule.